IPS News Letter 10/2/25
Bread and Circuses 3.0
Thousand Hoaxes
Yesterday was the hoaxiversery of the deadliest mass shooting in modern US history. Las Vegas was a divisive event. It split autohoaxers from false flaggers. Many people I knew at the time lied and claimed to know victims. Others were falling into the Q-cult and insisted that if it was fake Q would have told them, choosing instead to believe that the Deep State did Las Vegas to frame President Trump. At the time, Alex Jones said it was a Taliban attack and included shooting around the city, which was being covered up by the media.
Without even looking at the footage, consider this: 50 of the victims were re-victimized at another mass shooting, this time in California. During this second shooting, at the Borderline Bar and Grill in Thousand Oaks, a drill was taking place a few miles away. This drill involved 50 participant crisis actors, and the script they used was based on the Las Vegas shooting. In other words, 50 victims are re-victimized while their original traumatic event is recreated a few miles away.
Yes, there were at least 50 survivors of the 2017 Las Vegas Shooting present at the 2018 Borderline Bar and Grill shooting in Thousand Oaks, California. This was confirmed by Nicholas Champion, a Las Vegas survivor who was at the Borderline during the attack. He stated that 50 to 60 people from the Route 91 Harvest Festival were present at the bar when the shooting occurred.
Las Vegas Shooting Survivors: Many survivors of the Route 91 Harvest Festival, where 58 people were killed and hundreds were injured, had formed a close-knit support community.
Borderline Bar as a Gathering Spot: The bar was a popular venue for survivors, particularly those from Ventura County, California, who often met there for events like College Country Night.
Overlap in Victims: Survivors, like Brendan Kelly and Nicholas Champion, were present but escaped unharmed
The Borderline Bar became a “safe space” for Las Vegas survivors, making the overlap between the two events particularly tragic and ironic.
Kirk’s Not Dead.
Truthers are certain he’s dead, but are unclear on how or who.
As a skeptic, I can’t become a believer without the plethora of Hoax Indicators being refuted. Hoax Indicators include:
Deviations from protocol
Readily implementable political agendas
Predictive/ concurrent programming
Planted red herring conspiracy theories and truther-bait
Narrative over facts/ Scooby Doo justice
Shills
Owen Shroyer is not a journalist nor an investigator; he’s not a researcher trying to uncover the “truth” the lying media hides. Now is the time to really push back against these clowns. They have some entertainment value, but they are 100% propagandists.
They don’t have original opinions or thoughts. Remember, Candace Owens said “no blood.” Several people thought, “Wow, she sees the truth,” but no—she was setting up the second shooter narrative. She knows Charlie Kirk is not dead.
Owen Shroyer was part of the Jan 6 psyop; he knows Kirk is not dead.
I’m not really here to argue with MSM types. I prefer to address MSM+, but I have no intent to convince them of anything. They can’t see outside their frame of reference from their point of view. The only reason to engage is to expose their operating system for those who have figured out how to see through the false binary. The MSM and the MSM+ cannot arrive at the truth. They have a flawed methodology.
The Bloody Guardrail
The BLOODY GUARDRAIL is one of the final barriers.
Until people can see it’s a MAGIC SHOW and not a SNUFF FILM, they won’t get past this one.
Only MSM+ are capable of seeing the magic show, albeit selectively. MSM can’t get that far.
I’ve noticed many “MSM” programmed minds can’t even entertain hypothetical situations that contradict what they believe. Their emotions override their intellect.
Reject the Anti
I think the World Stage can be deconstructed by pointing out the linguistic structures that lock minds into it. For example, “Anti-Vax” puts one into a controlled dialectic. Antivaxxers should be Non-vaxxers if that is their preference. But if they aren’t activists, the ANTI should be dropped.
Do non-smokers and non-drinkers call themselves anti-smokers or anti-drinkers? All cults put their followers into the basic us/them binary.
There are no ANTI positions from the Offworld Stage perspective.
Fake News is Fake History
Imagine if Mud Flooders could stop focusing on fake history from 200+ years ago and start seeing the real-time manipulation of history in the daily fake news. These fake-conspiracy trends are put there specifically to protect the big secret about history manipulation/Metascripting. All conspiracy theories are part of a Meta-Conspiracy to keep people unaware of the World Stage model they have unwittingly accepted, and how it molds their perceptions every moment of their lives.
But “seeing is believing.” No, seeing should not be believing in all circumstances. Certainly not with magic shows, professional wrestling, or mass media events.
This is why I’ve been making a point about not expecting the visual deconstruction to provide evidence of fakery. It is not reasonable to think that we can rely upon slip-ups.
When someone says, “The Trump shooting looked fake.” No. It doesn’t. Yes, we understand it’s a magic show—it doesn’t mean we have to pretend to see through the illusion with our eyes. I think we have to list all the hoax indicators and weigh them against the visuals. This will deconstruct fake events, no matter how good the performances and SFX get.
Points of View
For the purposes of media deconstruction, I categorize people according to their points of view:
MSM people all process mediated/broadcast information in the same way.
Same for the MSM+.
Lots of UFO fanatics are actually mainstream (MSM) and consider them benevolent; those who are MSM+ get into underground bases and incoming invasions, and government coverups. The division is perfect. The mainstream view is that aliens are likely benevolent, space brothers, an advanced version of us, etc, while the MSM+ view is that the aliens are hostile, if not demonic.
This tracks with the Political Horseshoe structure—left worships science, right worships religion. The left loves aliens and views them as hi-tech angels. The right loves angels, and sees aliens as demonic, hostile entities that attack former Fox News hosts in their beds in harrowing nocturnal attacks that leave scars..
Most MSM+ types who question NASA, Alex Jones included here, don’t call the space program fake but rather assume it’s more advanced than NASA admits. The “Secret Space Program” is how they answer the question of whether NASA is lying. They ADD (the “+” in “MSM+”) to the lies rather than subtracting the unverified claims.
Predictive Programming Demystified
In case you were wondering, “predictive programming” is “product placement” for scheduled psychological operations. The Charlie Kirk “assassination” was planned before he was hatched or born, or however these people get here.
Movies, books, video games, and other media that contain “predictive programming” would obviously emerge AFTER the psyop has already been written and scheduled. The Charlie Kirk assassination psyop would have been on the Program decades before the event.
Predictive Programming is more like Product Placement than “demonic manifestation of a simulation run by dark occult forces that must tell us what they are about to do.”
Aside from concurrent programming, we need to get across the point that Predictive Programming implies scripted, scheduled future psyops. This is a key point when explaining the Metascript concept. School fire drills, analogously, are planned at the start of the school year. Psyops, which augment our historical timeline, are planned much further in advance than the next year. The older the Predictive Programming, the further back it was planned.
We can’t just trust truthers who call the news fake or staged. If they aren’t connecting Predictive and Concurrent psyop reinforcement to a SCRIPT—the METASCRIPT—and long-term manipulation of History, they aren’t up to speed.
Autohoaxers are outnumbered by the Mudflooders—and we have better evidence for their central tenet: that history is faked/manipulated. We prove it every day with the daily News Bending (which is the influence of psyops on the news cycle).
We demonstrate History Bending every day.
Mud Flooders want to keep their heads in the mud, and the Mystics are lost in woo.
Objective skeptical autohoaxers figured out the game, and yet the majority of truthers would rather play in the mud with their heads in the clouds.
Someone asked me, “Do you think the novels ‘Futility’ and ‘The Wreck of the Titan’, which were written before the Titanic, were PP or coincidence?”
As a rule, predictive or concurrent programming reinforces staged, simulated events. I think the Titanic story is a metaphor for the fall of the West, and as such, the “sinking” was likely a hoax, and therefore, I would consider those as predictive programming. The purpose: to establish the narratives in and around the sinking of the Titanic in the minds of those who would consume the news of the fake event prior to its occurrence.
Recognizing Disinfo Agents
Big disinfo accounts never acknowledge or delete their disinfo, even when corrected. Their job is to discredit and confuse those attempting to understand what predictive programming actually is (product placement and reinforcement propaganda about future psyops planned and scheduled long in advance).
It is highly revealing that big conspiracy accounts NEVER correct themselves or acknowledge they had it wrong—they leave the disinfo posts up.
Syncromysticism or Metascript?
Mystics imply something other than man is doing the psyop-related predictive programming. Due to a lack of a better grasp of the situation, their model has never been challenged before. But now, the Synchromystic explanation has been weighed against the Metascript one. The rational, logical, demonstrable truth is that history is bent by man, not by “mystic” forces.
Recognizing propaganda makes you a media analyst, not a mystic.
This is what keeps the Synchromystic in Trutherville, firmly ensconced within the MSM+ box. They lose their claims to mystic insight because their evidence for having interacted with the divine cosmic order is actually just subtle government propaganda. This is too bitter a pill for many proponents of that explanation.
If we are to be charitable and agree that these are indeed Mystics, then we must therefore also accept the mantle of mystics ourselves, as we have discerned quite a lot of interconnectedness with media psyops and entertainment.
However, if we refuse the label for ourselves, we cannot grant it to others in any seriousness. Either Autohoaxers are mystics and we are discerning the hand of the Universe working in mysterious ways, or we are propaganda analysts who recognize the patterns and structures that entrain entertainment with simulated events.
The Mandela Effected were convinced they were interacting with the Universe in a new way---that it was splintered into various timelines which merged in the now, but revealed discrepancies. This is a very attractive premise. It is also a “mystical” proposition.
As it turns out, the Mandela Effect is the Misinformation Effect, likely intentionally inflicted on unprepared minds to observe its effects. Could masses be gaslighted en masse? The answer, sadly, is yes.
While I won’t be telling mystics, mandoozled or otherwise, that they are mistaken, I will continue to criticize such claims whenever I see such muddying the waters.
The Metaconspiracy:
All the separate state-approved conspiracy theories (red pills, trutherism, Q Anon) are not only fake, but are all part of a larger, unified psychological war. This is a REAL conspiracy.
Alt-Media Isn’t Led By Controlled Opposition; It Is the Controlled Opposition
The controlled opposition is not a group of planted agents operating like wolves in sheep’s clothing, surreptitiously steering the perception of conspiracy theorists.
Think about it: if you can agree that the mainstream media is controlled and that it is the opposition to the alternative media, then could we not describe it as “controlled opposition” to the alternative media? Yes.
Both sides are controlled: it’s not just the individual pundits. All their followers are part of that media ecosystem.
Psyops imitate art.
The IPS Think Tank examines media fakery and properly contextualizes it within the “worldview” created by the mass media. We consistently observe the relationship between fake news and predictive and concurrent programming. This relationship, this entrainment between entertainment and news, is deliberately engineered to help the public accept a particular version of history as it’s created day by day.
We assume nothing. Major historical events, such as the big psyops, must be assumed to be staged and fake unless facts suggest otherwise.
Thank you for subscribing and supporting the IPS Think Tank. We will be live with Fakeologist today at https://infiniteplane.live/
Tim Ozman,
IPR Host
